SES SA (OTCPK:SGBAF) Q3 2023 Earnings Conference Call November 2, 2023 9:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Richard Whiteing – VP & Head, IR
Ruy Pinto – CEO
Sandeep Jalan – CFO
Conference Call Participants
Aleksander Peterc – Societe Generale
Roshan Ranjit – Deutsche Bank
Carl Murdock-Smith – Berenberg
Operator
Hello, and welcome to the year-to-date 2023 Results SES S.A announces financial results for the 9 and 3 months ended 30th September 2023. My name is Laura, and I will be a coordinator for today’s event. Please note, this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions].
I will now hand you over to your host, Richard Whiteing, Head of Investor Relations, to begin today’s conference. Thank you.
Richard Whiteing
Thanks, Laura, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining this analyst and investor call for our year-to-date 2023 results. We appreciate you accommodating the change of date given the material agreement adjustment. This morning’s presentation was uploaded along with the press release to the Investors section at ses.com, if you don’t already have it. And as always, please note the disclaimer at the back of the document. In a moment, Ruy Pinto, CEO, will present the main business highlights, followed by Sandeep Jalan, CFO, to cover the financials in more detail. After some closing remarks from Ruy, we will take your questions.
And on that note, let me hand over to Ruy.
Ruy Pinto
Thanks, Richard. Good morning, everyone. Again, our apologies for changing the date, but we wanted to give you an mPOWER update that is material to our company. And that justifies just advancing it by a couple of days. So please starting on Page 3. Let me go through the highlights of our announcement. I’m really pleased that our year-to-date financial performance has been good, solid and good. Our Networks business has delivered growth on the back of positive outturns across each of the 3 sectors: Growth Government, global in the U.S., Mobility and Fixed Data Enterprise and cloud. Also, on our media video segment, our revenue performance was consistent with our expectations, and we have signed and are signing important long-term renewals across our valuable TV neighborhoods. A couple of examples of Telefonica and Spain, Canal+ in Africa, and I’ll elaborate a little bit more during the call, but it’s a really good performance from our YTD team.
Therefore, we are on track to deliver our full year 2023 financial outlook. And I have to say that it’s really pleasing to see that result. I’m also delighted to announce that following the FCC certification of our Phase II USC debt clearing, we have now collected incentive payment of $3 billion gross pretax. This is a true milestone. We have been working on it for quite some time, as you all know. We enable the accelerated deployment of 5G service in the U.S. while preserving our key customer services and realizing substantial value to the company. And having that milestone ticked off is really a set in the cap of the team that achieved it. We’re already putting a portion of these proceeds to work in a very disciplined way. We announced a share buyback program of up to €150 million, and we intend to start executing on that program with practically immediate effect in November 2023. At the same time, we have decided to call the hybrid bond of €550 million, in line with our objective of reducing leverage and lowering our overall cost of debt.
If we could please move to Page 4, and I’ll jump straight to the mPOWER update. And let me start that on one hand, it’s disappointing that we are not — we will not be in service as early as we would have hoped. But clearly, we as a company have to get this right, and we work hard and expensive with our partner supplier Boeing to make sure that what we understand the causes of the fed that we have observed in space. And sure and more important that we have a solid plan moving forward to deploy the mPOWER constellation. We have made a lot of progress towards identifying the cause of the mPOWER module issues that I have mentioned back in August with 4 satellites in orbit, we collected quite frankly, a really good amount of data, and we’re now in a position to not only understand what is happening, but also to have a technical fix for the problems. I also have to say that after this assessment of an investigation over the last few months, we determined that the initial satellites in August, we will have a significant reduction in anticipated operational lights under legal capacity. However, one of the beauties of these extremely flexible software satellite is that we can trade that. In other words, this our model indicates that we have been, for example, pessimistic on the longevity of these satellites, we can trade that by adding capacity to the constellation and vice versa. This flexibility allows us to be confident that we can start our service in early Q2 2024.
Importantly, and I should mention that very clearly, we expect that with the mitigations in place our existing O3b new constellation customers will be supported as well as the O3b mPOWER customers. With still room for further customers and market growth from early Q2 next year. We always like to keep personally a bit of margin, but this may be as early as April, if our tests continue to proceed as we planned. However, it’s a little bit later by a quarter than what we planned before. Therefore, we have to adjust the expectations that you all have on the stop of service of the consolidation. Furthermore, we continue to work, and we are going to deliver on the full life cycle condition the O3b mPOWER constellation and we are going to be upgrading the remaining 5 satellites, 7 to 11 and deliver an additional 2 satellites with Boeing beginning not only the remedy or the fixing of the design weakness that we identified but also the construction of 2 new mPOWER satellites that will be delivered in record time.
Including our agreement with Boeing, which we finalized yesterday, we are confident that we are going to accommodate this additional investment within our existing CapEx envelope from 2023 to 2027. And this is a mix of our material agreement with Boeing, where Boeing and SES are sharing the risk and possibly insurance proceeds, but that is still being investigated depends on the performance of the satellites in orbit. Therefore, it’s expected the impact of the O3b mPOWER delay of 1 quarter will be in the order of mid-single-digit percentage lower in terms of 2024 revenue and adjusted EBITDA. However, we are not giving up on that. And there are potential mitigations. We are looking at how can we best optimize our extensive MEO and GEO fleet let me serve our customers and preserve as much of our revenue. We are preserving our backlog of size on important customers. And there are a number of strategic programs that we are working on. Some of them you know that may help us mitigate the impact of this delay.
This is a solid plan. We are confident on that plan, and it will enable our customers to already benefit from those to the O3b mPOWER system from early next year from Q2 next year. And we will focus on delivering a capable system to the market, which would be the bedrock of the long-term success of our Networks business. As one example, and to alley, maybe some of the possible concerns, we have done a successful demonstration of mPOWER S1 and S2 in India at the India Mobile Congress with our partner, Liang GEO. They branded this the Geo Space fiber, and we have demonstrated gigabit per second capabilities for a number of remote sites alongside GEO, including a demonstration to Prime Minister Modi, and that was just last week. So this was actual satellites actual demonstrating the capabilities of the mPOWER constellation in orbit as we have planned.
So on that note, let me move quickly to the key elements of our year-to-date performance on the next slide, please. Our revenue of €1.5 billion year-to-date is fully in line with expectations. In the last 9 months as well, we have signed a total of €1.3 billion of contract renewals and new business wins across the group. I couldn’t be more pleased with that outcome, given the fact that competition is intense in all our sectors, certainly on the network side. This result includes €835 million of revenue on the 3 network verticals. A couple of notable wins are the Mexico CFE program using SCF17, and it’s a pleasure to be able to help with digital inclusion in Mexico. We have had several U.S. covenant awards, one that is notable is the Air Force use program that we have won and there are other deals as well in the Aviation cruise customers section as well.
We also did decide a partnership with Starlink, which benefits our customers and increases our market penetration in the crude sector, and we are very proud of that. This is all complemented by €445 million backlog that we have secured in video, notably, some multiyear transponder renewals with Telefonica in Spain, the successful extension of U.K. TV until the end of the decade, the renew of Canal+ in Africa, renewal of QVC, RTL, HD+ and a number of others. Our media video team has been very diligent and disciplined in trying to withstand market pressure in terms of price and even sometimes being able to invest some of our contracts, and that’s a good outcome. We are also maintaining a strong repo costs and discretionary spend with adjusted EBITDA with an adjusted EBITDA of €792 million.
If we could move then to Page 6, please. Third quarter revenue grew 8.6% year-on-year for networks, and it’s really good to see the rebound on Government, 15% year-on-year. It’s a priority sector for us where we feel that we have differentiated capabilities. This resulted in year-to-date results being 5% higher than in 2020, including growth in all 3 verticals. You can also spot from the bullets that the sector where we have more intense competition is fixed data, but even there, we achieved a 2.3% year-on-year growth. If we move on to Page 7, please. On the video side, as I trailed just before, we are tracking really well against forecast. We saw a reduction of 2.5% year-on-year in the third quarter. And that contributed to the last 9 months underlying revenue closing of 3.2% lower versus 2022. These are secular trends that we are all familiar with. And we believe that we are better than the competition, certainly this year. These trends continue to be largely lower volumes in mature markets with pricing stable to increasing and contract duration remaining very healthy and strong and long. So the small sector of sport events is one that we are very proud of because we are seeing our growth in there, including a contract with FIFA that is notable that we managed to get.
With that, I will hand over to our CFO, Sandeep, to give more details on the financial suite.
Sandeep Jalan
Thanks, Ruy, and good morning, everyone. Starting with the financial highlights on Page 9, and as Ruy already explained the brief highlights. Reported revenue for the first 9 months was 7% up year-on-year to €1.44 billion, including the full contribution from acquisition of DRGs that we completed in August of last year. On a like-for-like basis, our revenue was slightly higher compared to year-to-date September 2022. Adjusted EBITDA of €792 million was about 5% lower, both on a reported basis as well as on a like-for-like basis. This represented a margin of 5%. Adjusted net profit was €180 million, and I will cover this in a moment. In more details, the financial outlook for 2023 is fully refined with revenue, adjusted EBITDA and CapEx, each being on track versus the outlook we gave in fabric in this year.
Moving now to the net income walk on Page 10. Adjusted EBITDA was €37 million lower compared to year-to-date September last year, and it was driven by 4 main components as shown in the table. First, €6 million positive from the scope effect of the DRG acquisition and forex; second, 5% growth in networks of €37 million, including the periodic revenue of €7 million that we have recognized in quarter 1 of this year. The third component is video declined by €33 million, including the periodic effects. On an underlying basis, radio was 3% lower year-on-year, which represents an improvement versus the 7% decline that we reported last year for 2022, and we are pleased with this flattening trajectory. Finally, recurring OpEx was higher by €47 million, as we had anticipated with our guidance. Bill adjusted EBITDA, lower interest expense contributed positively to adjusted net profit by €27 million versus the prior period. The main movements leading to adjusted net profit of €180 million were almost entirely noncash, particularly higher depreciation linked to a CS1 billion service, additional amortization and lower net forex gain than the prior years. The event between adjusted net profit and reported net profit of €682 million is primarily explained by the C-band income-related effects. We are very pleased by a fantastic execution of the C-band project that full success and 100% proceeds have now been realized in cash mostly in October.
First effective that we have recognized a significant C-band net income of €2.7 billion, which is close to $3 billion. This income recognition also implies that we have converted an intangible asset on our balance sheet into real cash. And hence, we have also recorded a noncash impairment charge of €1.55 billion on the intangible assets triggered from this recognition of C-band income. We have also recognized the tax payable on these proceeds of about €0.5 million, which after including other positive effects from impairment effects, et cetera, amounted to a net charge of €0.44 billion in the P&L.
Moving on to Page 11. We continue to focus on maintaining a strong and sector-leading balance sheet with investment-grade metrics, now further bolstered by U.S. C-band proceeds fully realized in cash by now. Adjusted net debt at 30 September was €3.7 billion. We have not only a low cost of funding around 3%, but also a healthy maturity profile of 7 years with only €400 million of senior debt for a due for maturity during the next couple of years. Leverage stood at 3.4x, essentially unchanged from the end of last year. Now since the end of September, as we reported, we have fully received the Phase II C-band incentive payment of $3 million. We expect to pay the tax of €5 billion. And we will now start the share buyback of €150 million that we had announced in August. This buyback represents the maximum amount authorized by AGM resolution that demonstrates our belief in the business pedometers.
We also intend to exercise the call on the €550 million hybrid bond at the upcoming maturity in January 2024, thanks to the C-band proceeds that we have realized. Hybrid Board continued to remain an integral part of our capital structure, including the 2026 hybrids that we have on our sheet. Additionally, we expect a further $445 million of U.S. C-band cost reimbursement. The process of reimbursement remains much lower than our expectations. Nonetheless, we have so far received over $0.9 million of reimbursements and continue to engage with the clearing house to close outstanding claims. When adjusting for these items, this leaves a pro forma adjusted net debt of around €1.5 billion and net leverage of around 1.5x. We remain committed to using the C-band proceeds in the best interest of shareholders and expect to provide further clarity with the full year results in February. In the meantime, the cash is earning interest income of more than 5%.
With that, I will hand back to Ruy for the conclusions.
Ruy Pinto
Thanks, Sandeep. I appreciate that. So to sum up on Page 13, please. I’m clearly pleased with our continued strong financial performance, which means we are fully on track to achieve our financial targets for 2023. We now have the substantial C-band proceeds, which further support what I’m sure is a sector-leading financial position and strength. We are deploying, as announced before for €150 million share buyback program, and we are exercising our option to call the hybrid in keeping with our commitment to be financial discipline and lowering our cost of debt. As you heard from Sandeep, we expect to provide further clarifications regarding the financial policy in end of February next year, but that’s a good problem to have if you ask me.
While I appreciate that today’s news on at mPOWER will require a little bit more patience from the market as we work to deliver the constellation of full life type capabilities and growth potential. We can move forward to starting services in Q2, early Q2 next year with the ability to still support our existing O3b mPOWER customers as well as additional services and market growth. We have a solid plan to manage the near-term operation shortcomings, deploy satellites that will have a design improvement addressing the issues that we have been basically investigated and adding 2 brand-new satellites, the constellation alongside our partner Boeing. This will ensure that SES will deliver the highly differentiated capabilities of O3b mPOWER and will deliver long-term growth and success to our networks business. So we did the right thing here. I’m really pleased that we have a solid plan going forward despite the fact that we are not exactly where we wanted to be in terms of schedule.
With that, thank you very much, and we are happy to take questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions]. We’ll now take our first question from Aleksander, at Societe Generale.
Aleksander Peterc
I just have two, the first one would be, should investors expect any further capital allocation decisions beyond the reimbursement of the hybrids that you just announced and the €150 million buyback that was previously announced. Is there more to come still in this front? Or are you happy with your capital structure right now? And then the follow-up is just on the impact of the mPOWER delay, which of the 3 verticals in networks is going to be more affected and which one less, so we can model this correctly.
Sandeep Jalan
So on your first question, clearly, the hybrid continue to remain an integrate part of our capital structure, we have 200 in our balance sheet as we stand today with the C-band proceeds in our pocket and the current capital market conditions. We have the upcoming call on these hybrids in January 2025 that we intend to call. Of course, these are decisions that we will continue to take, taking into account the latest capital market conditions where these instruments may be quite cost are in the market. Regarding further clarity on the financial policy, as I already spoke earlier, we are currently assessing our plans and with our annual results in February, we’ll be giving more clarity. The current share buyback is already at the maximum level of €150 million, which is authorized by our Annual General Meeting. Clearly, the direction of the financial policy remains a solid financial policy led a heavy focus on investment in great, stable to progressive dividend and disciplined investments — and clearly, with the C-band proceeds now in pocket and with our upcoming focus on the next year plans that we are currently assessing. This is something we will engage with our board and provide more clarity as we go forward at the end of February.
Ruy Pinto
Thanks, Sandeep. Also commenting on your second question. We believe that the differentiated high throughput and flexibility of mPower is stronger on government and mobility. We are quite confident that our growth plans and ambitions on those 2 sectors are going to be minimally impacted by this delay. But I would also say that on fixed data deposit and cloud, the competition — and the price erosion is intense. So every month that we deliver, of course, there is a little bit of an impact. So if you wanted to put an order, I would say, government and mobility are still a strong sector for us in the enterprise and cloud or fixed data is a sector where we have to pay more attention.
Operator
We’ll now move on to our next question from Roshan, at Deutsche Bank.
Roshan Ranjit
I’ve got a few on mPOWER, please. Firstly, the backlog this quarter, understandably, I guess, it didn’t move up materially versus previous quarter. And you do highlight a big chunk is protected backlog. But is there a risk that given that we’ve had this additional delay and customers go to some of the alternatives? Ruy mentioned mobility and government being key verticals. We have seen a few competitors make a bit of progress here on that front, having signed capacity contracts. Anything you could say there would be useful, please. On the CapEx envelope and the 2 incremental satellites, you mentioned scope for insurance payout. Have you got clarity that you will receive that? Or is this something which you are looking to investigate, please? Sticking with the CapEx, you highlighted that the lifetime of the existing satellites in orbit has been shortened. So I guess in this current evolution, we are talking about shorter CapEx cycles. But is there not a risk that you have to start getting the next situation of mPOWER up and running given the shorter life frames, please. And secondly, just lastly, just on the operational front, government had a very strong performance this quarter. Anything on that? Or are we now fully washed through the withdrawal of troops from previous quarters that you mentioned? Or could we expect this to be a new trend going forward in government?
Sandeep Jalan
Let me take the questions in turn. So on the backlog — the fact that we are going to start our service in early Q2 gives us a high level of cost that the backlog will not be impacted. We still have margin — a bit of margin in our customer commitments and on our backlog that will give us — that gives us confidence that the backlog has not been impacted given the new in-service date and the launch of mPOWER S5 and S6, actually, we are on the money faster for our launch on the 12th of November. So there is margin there is not something that is worrying us. Of course, it’s not infinite margin, but there is margin, and we are confident that with the start of service in early Q2, possibly in April that we are not going to have an issue with our protected backlog.
On the CapEx envelope, we have kept, of course, our insurance fully in the loop on the investigation as we should. But the agreement that we have with Boeing and the sharing of risk that we have with buying gives us confidence that we can deploy 2 additional satellites without impacting our CapEx envelope and without depending on insurance proceeds. And that’s an important point. That does not mean that we are not going to explore the insurance revenue, but it’s not a dependency on our CapEx envelope. Boeing and SES are working together on making sure that this groundbreaking service goes up, it’s important for both companies, and we worked extensively with them on how to proceed with the mPOWER constellation.
In terms of lifetime, I’m not sure I captured the question completely. But as I mentioned in my opening remarks, we have flexibility with these satellites in terms of deploying capacity versus lifetime on the initial satellites. So we can adapt to the ramp-up of our customers. As you can imagine, I mean, we are going to have a 12 months leave or take period where we will be carefully managing the constellation, and we have flexibility and margin to make sure that our ramp-up is fulfilled and protected for our customers. Finally, on government, if I remember the question, you know that government, they have their own cycle in terms of budget and execution. And sometimes it’s not uncommon for you to have signed contracts that have delays due to milestone delivery or project execution, more in government than in other sectors. So it’s not something that worries us that sometimes it moves to south because it’s guaranteed drag and guaranteed customers. So again, not really concerned on that front.
Ruy Pinto
Just to complement, you are seeing an effect of this sort of approach at the end of the year as you start delivering and speeding up, sorry, for the addition there.
Roshan Ranjit
I’m sorry, just to check, you said 12th of November for satellites 5 and 6 to be launched they’re on site now, I see…
Sandeep Jalan
They are quite comfortable in Cape Canabo, of course, it’s no early than 12th of November. We are working closely with SpaceX. We are the manifesto. We have our second stage. It’s all good to go. So we have an already agreed date. And as you know, in launches, we have a day, a backup base, you’re subject to weather and to the loan things, but we are there.
Operator
And our last question comes from [indiscernible] at Barclays.
Unidentified Analyst
I have two questions. The first one, we refer to a mid-single-digit impact to revenue and EBITDA next year. Are you effectively providing a 2024 guidance for current consensus numbers, like less around 5%? Or when we get to February, could there a series of other things that could change the numbers. And this mid-single-digit number is just one part of that. The second one is also related to that, that like when we say a mid-single-digit impact before mitigation can we quantify the impact of any potential mitigations that you are looking at, even if we understand that you cannot be confident on this right now. And the final question. Overall, are we basically thinking about losing a year in your growth plan? Or could the delays and capacity issues also impact your growth in 2025 compared to what you might have talked before. Thanks a lot.
Ruy Pinto
I think Sandeep and I will take turns. I didn’t quite get the first question, but I think I believe it’s Sandeep. I think it then between guidance and the expectations.
Sandeep Jalan
So clearly, good question. So as we explained to you about the mPOWER situation, this mid-single-digit percent lower revenue and EBITDA is to give you a kind of magnitude that we are looking at, looking at all the components that Ruy explained earlier, these components basically include fast delayed start of service from April early quarter 2 compared to 2023 and 2023 that we’re expecting. Second, the necessary operational procedures, mitigation procedures that we are putting in place to upgrade new satellites and lower ramp up. So these are the current impacts that we are expecting from the mPOWER related effects, this is not including in potential mitigation effects. We are — as you can imagine, we are at early stages. We are assessing all the potential mitigations, including usage of our own extensive fleet of suites. MEO Classic as well as GEO fleet and other mitigating actions. This is not a guidance for 2024 or beyond. And this is a process that we have in early phases again. We are currently going through our business plans and budgets, and that’s a process that we’ll undertake in February. In February, you can expect a full year guidance, which will include a comprehensive assessment of mPOWER situation, the necessary mitigations and our full-fledged plan, including our geo-capacity, which are a very important part of our fleet. So this is not an annual guidance. This aims to give you a magnitude of the impact that we currently see and transparent can tell you this is our expectation and vis-a-vis where the consensus currently stands.
Ruy Pinto
And if I may add on the second question, the third one, Sandeep captured it really well. We have a very diverse business with geo-capacity, multi-orbit, neoclassic, video and media, some services and so on. We do believe that once we dig deep into the planning for 2024, we will be able to mitigate some of the impact of the mPOWER delay. But we are being very upfront so that you have full visibility of our thinking, and we’ll come back, as Sandeep mentioned in February with a fully formed view. There are, for example, programs that we don’t put into our business plan because they are speculative or at an early stage. And if we can forecast what we could expect from those projects in 2024, these numbers can change in the right direction.
And finally, in terms of growth for 2025, we fully expect that by the end of ’24, Q4 and Q1 ’25, we will have additional capacity coming online in mPOWER that will not be limited by these small and understandable operational shortcomings. So that we’ll be able then to perhaps even have an upside on our growth trajectory depending on market conditions. So I’m actually more optimistic about 2025 because of the plan that we have in place.
Operator
And we’ll take our final question from Carl Murdock-Smith at Berenberg.
Carl Murdock-Smith
Two questions from me. In the presentation, you say that the buyback will start in November. Just practically, when is the first day that you can go into the market and buy shares. So I take it it’s not today. Following on from that, following on from question Roshan asked actually. Just I’d wonder if you could provide a bit more detail on the risk sharing that you’ve mentioned with Boeing. Is that something new in relation to the scale of delays that there have been over time? Or is it retrospective and something that’s in contract upfront? And kind of any detail you can provide in terms of the nature of that risk sharing? And how that works practically would be great.
Sandeep Jalan
So I’ll take the first one. I’ll give the second one for Ruy. So as you know, they are coming out now the close period. We will start a share buyback as soon as possible. Now the money is well, is in the bank. So you could expect that with in coming days. I mean we are just setting the mandate, et cetera. So as we go out of the cost paid starting tomorrow. And we will start to buy back as soon as possible.
Ruy Pinto
And on your second question, so the risk sharing, we have reshaped our agreement with Boeing. Boeing and SES, both companies have a strong interest in the success of mPOWER. This new technology that is working in space. It’s important for Boeing and for SES that, that new technology works flawlessly in space and that we can deploy it with our customers. So having a couple objective with Boeing was essential to a negotiation that involved the reshaping of the contract of the agreement where both companies took an element of risk in the delivery and the capital expenditure and in adding to the capabilities of the constellation. Of course, I cannot disclose any details, but I can tell you that we are together in sharing the risk and investing further on mPOWER, both Boeing and SES.
Operator
There are no further questions in the queue. I will now hand it back to Richard for closing remarks. Thank you.
Richard Whiteing
Thanks all. Thanks for joining. As we said at the start, thanks converting the earlier timing as ever, myself and the IR team remain available with the early follow-up questions. Have a great day. And if we don’t speak, have a wonderful Christmas. Thank you. Goodbye.
Operator
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today’s call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Read the full article here
